Over the last eleven posts, I have retraced the final eleven days of Adolf Hitler’s life—from his 56th birthday in a burning Berlin to his final breath in a concrete bunker. We followed him and the people around him through paranoia, betrayal, fantasy, and finally, suicide. It’s a grim story, and a real one, built on testimony, physical evidence, and decades of careful research by a variety of serious people.
And yet, for all that, the conspiracy theory that Hitler somehow escaped continues to thrive.
It might seem like a harmless what-if, just another historical rabbit hole that you are free to jump in or not. But it’s not. It’s a wide open door to something much more corrosive: the idea that evidence doesn’t matter. That history is just a suggestion. That everything is up for debate, even the Holocaust.
When you claim Hitler survived, you don’t just deny the final scene, you unravel his entire life.
You reduce the testimony of countless witnesses—about Hitler’s actions, his physical and mental collapse—to nothing more than gossip. You plant the idea that truth is negotiable. That reality is what you want it to be.
That’s why it’s not just wrong, it’s dangerous. It doesn’t help us learn from the past. It wastes our time. It blinds us.
And it’s not the only way we distort the past.
That’s something I tried to explore in my documentary, You Don’t Know Hitler (2005). Originally made as my master’s thesis under the title Reel Nazis, the film uses Nazi propaganda footage—intentionally, surgically—to show how Hitler was presented versus what was really happening. I wanted to peel back the mythology. To show how the image of Hitler—the uniforms, the ceremonies, the speeches—was a mask. And the violent, paranoid, and destructive reality it was hiding.
But I also made that film in response to something I saw happening at the time.
In the years after 9/11, it became routine to call President George W. Bush a Nazi. Even before 9-11, it wasn’t entirely unheard of for people to call President Bill Clinton “a Hitler.” I include this in the film, not to relitigate their presidencies, but to make a point: if everyone’s a Nazi, no one is. If the term is just an insult, it loses all meaning. It becomes noise.
And while it’s true that Donald Trump has led the Republican Party—and much of the country—away from many of our ideals and democratic traditions, calling him, Hitler or his supporters Nazis still misses the mark. It simplifies something that should never be simplified. Nazism wasn’t just authoritarianism or self-aggrandizement. It wasn’t just nationalism or a step in the wrong direction. It was a total worldview, rooted in conspiratorial hatred, racial hierarchies, and genocidal violence. It was the reason the term “genocide” was created.
To label people as Hitler or a Nazis because they want to ban a book, or pass a bad law, or even behave like a demagogue, is not just intellectually lazy, it’s disrespectful to the victims of the real thing.
That was one of the central arguments of You Don’t Know Hitler. And I think it still holds today. We don’t learn from history by turning it into a mirror. We learn from history by recognizing it as something other than ourselves; something real, and awful, and specific. Only then can we understand how it happened. Only then can we ask the right questions. Only then can we apply it to our own times, thoughtfully and carefully.
There are questions about Hitler that are still worth asking and reevaluating.
What was Hitler? A failed artist turned demagogue? A political opportunist who believed his own lies? A true believer? A fanatic? A conspiracy theorist? A product of his time? A madman who dramatically shaped the times around him and the future?
You can view Hitler through many lenses: ideology, psychology, culture, art, propaganda, war, power. You can see Nazism as an extreme form of nationalism, as a cult built on pseudo-religious myths, rituals, and blood. There’s no one way to explain it. And no answer can ever be complete.
Even Hitler’s obsessive hatred of Jews—so central to his worldview, so catastrophic in its consequences—defies simple explanation. We know he preached antisemitism. We know what he did with it. But the exact reasons why it consumed him remain elusive.
And yet, in that ambiguity, there’s a lesson too.
You don’t need to fully understand where the hate came from to see what it did. You don’t need a perfect psychological profile to recognize the danger of conspiratorial thinking, of scapegoating, paranoia, and constructing an identity around imagined enemies. Hitler was a conspiracy theorist before he was anything else. So were his most fantical followers. That’s something too often overlooked and well worth remembering.
If you want to go deeper into the questions surrounding Hitler, the most comprehensive and thoughtful source I can recommend is Volker Ullrich’s two-volume biography, Hitler: Ascent and Hitler: Downfall. Written after years of research and with the benefit of generations of scholarship, Ullrich doesn’t flatten Hitler into a symbol or an anomaly. He doesn’t try to explain him away. He tries to understand what made Hitler possible, and what made him so destructive.
As Ullrich puts it: “Hitler’s tyranny lasted only twelve years, but it fundamentally changed the face of the world — albeit in a way completely different from what the dictator had intended.” He’s careful not to fall into either of the common traps, claiming Hitler was the inevitable outcome of a baneful German historical destiny, nor a regrettable accident suddenly visited upon Germans like a natural disaster.
“In many areas, Hitler was able to adopt what others had thought and done during Germany’s imperial era, but he always radicalised what he inherited and took it to extremes.”
Much of what made Hitler so successful was personal and performative. “He was interested not in the truth of his statements, but in whether they produced the maximum effect.” Ullrich describes him as “a modern type of politician who had mastered different roles and could coolly calculate how to use them towards his ends.”
“The system of rule Hitler established was also inseparable from himself as a person,” notes Ullrich. Hitler’s refusal to define clear responsibilities or delegate decisions was not laziness, it was a particular kind of leadership. Chaos and infighting preserved his control.
But Ullrich doesn’t place all the blame on one man. He emphasizes that “The ‘Hitler phenomenon’ is not merely the sum of his thoughts and deeds: it can only be understood by simultaneously examining the social pathology of German society at the time.” There was a demand for someone like Hitler. And he supplied what people were ready to believe.
That readiness—combined with grievance, fear, and national humiliation—was what made Nazism possible. And while Hitler’s actions were unique in their scope and violence, the broader danger he represents is disturbingly familiar.
As Reinhold Schneider wrote in 1946, “We are not and cannot be done with confronting Adolf Hitler.” Ullrich echoes that sentiment, less as a warning about the past than as a call to responsibility in the present.
If this series has sparked reflection or unease or new questions, then maybe it’s doing its job. The goal has never been to explain Hitler away, but to understand enough to make readers want to learn more, and learn from this.
We don’t know everything about Hitler. But we know a great deal. We know what he did. We know what it meant. And we know how it ended.
FULL SERIES:
Yes, Hitler Really Did Commit Suicide, 80 Years Ago
Part 1: April 20, 1945 – Hitler’s Last Birthday
Part 2: April 21, 1945 – The Net Tightens
Part 3: April 22, 1945 – The Breaking Point
Part 4: April 23, 1945 – The Succession Panic
Part 5: April 24, 1945 – The Axis of Betrayal
Part 6: April 25, 1945 – No Way Out
Part 7: April 26, 1945 – The Sky Closes
Part 8: April 27, 1945 – Rienzi
Part 9: April 28, 1945 – Wedding Day
Part 10: April 29, 1945 – The Day Before the End
Part 11: April 30, 1945 – Hitler’s Last Day
After the Bunker: What We Know, and Why It Matters
Leave a Reply